Why everyone hates group work (and what do about it).

“This assignment will be a group work”.

When I as a bachelor and master student heard the teacher utter this sentence, two things immediately came to my mind: (1) not again and (2) if I can choose my own group member, who should I choose? Everyone of course reacts in different way to the prospect of group work, but I do not think that my reaction is uncommon.  

For a variety of reasons group work is despised by students and celebrated by teachers. In this short reflective blog post, I want to give a brief reflection on why I think group work is so despised among many students and what can be done about it.

But first, why do so many students dislike group work, and why are they, like me, so keen on choosing their own group-members? Part of the truth can probably be found in the meme below:

The phrase “it is funny because it is true” has been so accurate; who can’t recall—or admit that they have been—one of these in a group work? While the people who are free-riding on the works of others can be annoying in the group, I don’t think the free-riding itself is the biggest issue. For me this was never that much of a problem: if people do not want to help, fine, there is usually enough people to carry the project over the finish line and deliver the end-product. The annoying part, I believe, mainly comes after the group work: when everyone, even the free-riders get the same grade.

To grade the end product as something that everyone in the group is equally responsible risks leading to that one diminished the individual contributions and the learning process itself. To solely grade the end product is a primary example of when the goals with the assignment, for example to increase collaborative learning and cooperation skills, does not correlate well with what is graded. In this case the assessment of the groupwork interferes with the groupwork by creating the wrong incentives. To think about what type of grading that will stimulate a great learning environment for group work could therefore be one way to make students hate group work a little less.

However, before answering the question about what type o grading that should be done, instructors should ask themselves another question: is a grade needed at all? Jesse Stommel, founder of the critical pedagogy lab, has been leading the way on ungrading, arguing that much common grading not as much about “giving feedback or encouraging learning and more as a way of ranking students against one another”. Stommel instead points out that there are other forms of assessment that can be done when necessary, such as grade free-zones, self-assessment, and process letters.  I particularly found the self-assessment very interesting. Self-assessment is when the students, in dialogue with the teacher, gives themselves a grade based on their performance. I think this can be particularly helpful in group work, where the students would be able to think and reflect about how they contributed to the group and—equally important—what they learned from the process.

In conclusion, the problem of group work may not be as much in group work itself but rather about how it is graded. It is therefore important to first think about if grading is needed for the particular assignment and, if it is needed, what type of grading that will stimulate a productive collaborative learning environment.  If one succeeds with this student may not only start hating group work a little less—they might even enjoy it.

5 reaktioner till “Why everyone hates group work (and what do about it).

  1. Very relevant reflections. Many introverted students also hate group work and feel they could do far better on their own without a lot of unnecessary time and effort. We are so focused on individual assessment and competition that we are not equipping students for their future careers where they will work in projects that are judged as the product of collaboration. If employers continually ask for graduates with team skills and an ability to work in diverse globally dispersed teams why do universities continue to focus on individual assessment? Possible because it’s easiest …


  2. Yes, sounds familiar. It’s also hilarious because even in this course, I have shades of similar experiences. The ”co-production” has largely been doing stuff individually, slapping it together and discussing through it, with some people disappearing because evidently it is more legitimate when a teacher as a students has other commitments than when a student student does the same. The outcome of our group work – not bad, but hardly the amazing ”1+1=3000” discourse that everyone at the same times swears by. And we are not even graded.

    Gillad av 1 person

  3. I fully agree with you on the grading part, I think it has been the greatest source of frustration for me as a student! Why am I forced to work with people who have completely different motivations and expectations, and is this how group work is going to be? It can certainly happen nowadays too, but there’s often a more shared motivation, especially if the task is not imposed. But then you still get those cases of something being voluntary, people asking to join a specific group and then just disappearing. I still find that puzzling.



Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:


Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Google-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Ansluter till %s

%d bloggare gillar detta: